Shalva KuteliaHi everyone, I’ve been wanting to say this for a very long time and since I’m not the only one anymore here goes:
I think the learning curve is way too steep in that you don’t even know where to begin as no part of MCA makes sense on its own therefore you simply can’t wrap your mind around the whole concept in order to start working with it quickly enough to tell whether it is something you want to commit to, I am certain that this alone is keeping a lot of potential customers from coming aboard as such is the nature of man that you never want to look incompetent and vulnerable.
My intention in writing this is not to act as apologist in favor of those who aren’t willing to do the work of figuring things out but rather to point to towards how things can be improved for everyone. With countless scammers and all sorts of salespeople around leaving no opportunity to verify if what they’re selling is legitimate and with forex being extremely challenging as it is it would be only to a benefit to make MCA more approachable, that said, I honestly think the information needs to be more packed together and have a more systemic character in a way something like this:
As a starting point a simple course explaining every element of an MK chart would be ideal followed by theory and what to pay attention to the most as well as a comprehensive guide on the simplest ways to use the service laying out specific setups and a summary of how MCA is an edge, next one could go into the details such as diagrams of relationships of indicators to one another, their hierarchy of significance and anything else that would enable one to become confident about achieving above 50/50 distribution provided there is impeccable work ethic. In terms of attracting more clients, basically I think it is essential to be able to get verifiable results using MCA easily, most especially so in a money-driven environment where people are unwilling just to take anybody’s word. There needs to be some sort of a portal separating beginners from those who are willing to take it further, how that can be done – I don’t know but it is certain that right now, if only for me personally, that using MCA effectively is extremely difficult bordering impossible as even after a year in my stops get still taken out and I don’t understand why or how so more clarity would probably help.
Shalva KuteliaYes, I watch all these videos, thank you
Shalva Kutelia..another thing I would like to clarify: when the net DM line is way above it’s counterpart but not sloping in any direction, does that mean the bias is low and OGZ and STS are now tradeable? How does this case compare to when both red and green squeeze lines are close by?
Shalva KuteliaOk that is great, thank you.
I will leave this here just in case anyone like me is more visual
Shalva KuteliaHi Djamal, I’ve been listening to what you’ve been saying in previous videos as well as this one in particular and I’ll be honest there are things I’ve been wanting to share with you in response to why more people don’t see the value in this project. If you feel like you’d want a totally different perspective I’m the right person, please let me know if you’re interested, if not that is ok. 🙏
Shalva KuteliaGreetings,
I guess I just need to get used to the fact that humans at large are clueless about every facet of life and yet would say anything to appear as being the opposite… without acting like it, that or/also there’s way more bots out there than one might assume.
Thank you for the clarification, love it,
All the best
Shalva KuteliaNowhere else in the world can you study the inner workings of FX markets other than here let alone receive generous experience and information on how to trade with a real edge by seeing what is actually moving the price.
I don’t know how anyone can be profitable in the long term without access to the service as otherwise they’re objectively several orders of magnitude worth of disadvantage trading blindly, to say this has been eye opening for me would be an understatement.
There is only so much one can say without coming off as unrealistic but the value that you get from SME is more than you thought was possible.
Shalva KuteliaGreetings everyone,
I would like to share an indicator with some predictive power namely “Fourier extrapolator” as the title of this post suggests.
At the lower time frames this indicator is practically useless but at H4 it can predict sudden moves with unusually high accuracy and from my experience it is also capable of predicting the direction of the spike with a higher than 50/50 probability.
The way I use it is apply the indicator on pairs that have the same currency in them: EUR/USD, EUR/JPY, EUR/CHF etc. (you may also want to pay attention to the correlated pairs) and once there is a very steep line pointing in the same direction on every chart it signals a large move is about to happen in a day or two, over a period of time before that you may often see a move in the opposite direction or nothing special at all.
You can easily find a free download on google both for the MT4 and MT5 versions.
Great trading!
Shalva KuteliaYes, I think that is describing the case well and, thank you for the confirmation.
Shalva KuteliaHi there, thank you, you are really good at crunching data and this is an extremely interesting.
I see, no fractal ever truly settles though does it, especially not with new actors entering the market all the time but that’s where all the information, both direct and oblique, on how to trade programs new traders into acting in a predictable manner so then algos utilize all sort of gaslighting tactics to give any approach a random distribution, even more, if the majority of market participants are unaware of what’s going on they turn this into a feedback loop hence the word “corruption” I used earlier instead of a natural self-organizing process moving towards iterative stability, this overlays with everyday life so much one could apply trading principles anywhere. The smart money boldness concept to me really is just them taking what was already there, continuously reiterating it to fit the manipulator’s agenda and presenting it as the original – something George emphasizes by quoting Stephen Hawking that “The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, but the illusion of knowledge”. It’s very obvious what’s going on here though judging this kind of behavior is inconsequential, exposing it in my honest opinion certainly should be welcome by anyone who is not an agent of the system and is aware enough.
I would argue actually that fractality has nothing to do with the direction of the market since I have this Fourier extrapolator indicator and sometimes, when it predicts a very steep move in either direction and that direction coincides with other currency pairs within a day or two the price is extremely likely to spike (though not before it moves in an opposite direction). This was not a random indicator I use since any pattern is a fractal and any fractal is self-similar motion therefore there just have to be cases of high level of predictability due to accumulated momentum that has to eventually reveal itself no matter what.
It’s so amazing that you’ve mentioned market’s “long term memory”, clustering and “self-organizing” as that’s how anything would’ve been created in the first place including ourselves. I’ve had a lot of success (in demo admittedly, H4) just opening the charts once and knowing where the price will generally move right away without analyzing anything, it’s clearly not a big deal for the subconscious so give us a feel of what’s going on if we just tune in and are not distracted.
Shalva KuteliaI think that answers my questions, thank you so much
Shalva KuteliaHi Djamal,
That was an excellent unpacking and explanation, particularly the 50/50 part, I’ve noticed a lot of things like that but until they click together it’s not much use obviously, it is a fascinating topic indeed although mind-bogglingly intimidating at first. I suppose I attributed more to the algos than they deserve.
I have another question then: can’t we reverse engineer everything that’s going on and automate it and how accurate a predictive power can we have in principle?
In the bigger picture, that is with both the people and the algos moving the markets, how much of previous tick data is taken into consideration by the algos for, let’s say, support and resistance levels? I mean, are the markets intrinsically fractal and manipulated or fractal because they are manipulated? Is there even such a thing as financial markets without manipulation on this planet?
The way I see it right now in terms of hierarchy is like this: Fractal unpredictable nature -> market manipulation -> manipulated partially predictable nature that DM participants take for fractal unpredictable nature and on top recursive feedback into the algos in the form of no easy money principle and the like.
Trying to separate natural phenomena from the manipulation here to elevate myself a level above the markets and see what’s going on ground up.
Thank you
Shalva KuteliaSo.. are you telling me one can totally conceptualize the entire manipulator model ?
Shalva KuteliaThinking of it that’s actually a profound idea, not only would a 100% accuracy discourage anybody from trading and make the manipulation too obvious but there’s also the part where you can’t curve fit true randomness in people’s choice so there must always be space to wiggle otherwise the model becomes less efficient, I guess that answers it, thanks Brent
Shalva KuteliaAre we trading against other guys or some sort of self-adjusting artificial intelligence though? It’s truly astounding how they manage to win no matter what you do leading me to believe there is some entity that learns on it’s own, that plus how in the world is anybody supposed to manually and seamlessly incorporate this many rules into an existing model keeping in mind that no trading system lasts forever?
Whether it’s other people or a machine behind the learning makes all the difference because the goal of a machine is maximum efficiency. It’s unthinkable to imagine that a human would be able to read others this well.
